Payments fraud leaves a trail. The advanced analytics employed by financial institutions are designed to detect these trails and generate alerts for follow up from the bank’s fraud team. However, financial institutions differ in the level of sophistication of their systems and, in turn, their ability to detect and prevent fraud.
Two recent blog posts provide some valuable insight into what financial institutions may want to consider when reviewing the efficiency and effectiveness of their risk analytics:
· Dan Barta from Banking Strategies describes in his recent article “Fighting Payments Fraud the Hybrid Way” that “With advanced analytics, fraud specialists can identify fraud earlier, even before the fraud occurs, thus eliminating or minimizing losses … A true hybrid approach identifies the linkages and associations between the various accounts and integrates that information with the more traditional rules and analytics to better score risk, prioritize alerts, reduce false positives, increase the efficiency of investigators and reduce fraud losses.” More
· Tracy Kitten from BankInfoSecurity covers the current state of the check fraud problem and check fraud detection efforts in her recent article “Check Fraud: The Next Generation”. The article reports that “76 percent of banks ranked check fraud second among the top fraud threats they faced in 2011, according to BankInfoSecurity's fraud survey.” The article quotes Andy Schmidt from Tower Group who explains, "The very nature of the paper item - that it can be deposited through multiple channels - mobile, ATM, lockbox, at the branch, etc. - makes it very hard to track." The article gives express advice for enhancing check fraud detection by automating manual monitoring processes and adding AML controls that examine factors such as check velocity and check number sequence. More
Financial institutions looking to protect payments from fraud should discern the adequacy of their current systems and review the possible returns from investing in better analytics.





